In the past fifteen years five major Giorgione catalogs have appeared. This truly remarkable publishing phenomenon must be due not only to an increasing interest in Venice and the Venetian Renaissance, but also to the mystery surrounding Giorgione. Below find brief reviews of the five catalogs, all of them beautifully illustrated. The images are from the covers of the respective catalogs.
In addition to a brief outline of their contents, I have tried to point out their divergent views on the "Tempest" and on the David Teniers' copy of the "lost" Giorgione, usually called the "Discovery of Paris." The learning and exhaustive research of the various authors has been of great value to me, but I do admit that none of them has been able to see the "Tempest" as "The Rest on the Flight into Egypt." Moreover, when they discuss the "Discovery of Paris," , they invariably follow Marcantonio Michiel's mistaken identification of the "Discovery of Paris." For my interpretation of both paintings see my website.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhS-glEzTBTNAeaOsVicO7hflFAXN5I39wGENEhiv3bHjV4Z5gIj1SluE8UsWfJ7bFbfKWlc1H9MTowZ9GWQF0mQ_8nieJHAQ0WTyPsgWUMSuSXOZNZtaNuURevBcri0bHnX03bGPF91A/s400/Giorgione+boy.jpg)
Anderson, Jaynie: "Giorgione, the Painter of Poetic Brevity," Paris, 1997.
Jaynie Anderson’s study is a solo work of almost 400 pages. Seven essays by the author take up the first three quarters of the book. Anderson studies Giorgione’s “poetic style;” his biographers and connoisseurs; the results of scientific analysis of his paintings; his patrons; his imagery of women; his critical fortunes; and his work on the Fondaco dei Tedeschi.
This comprehensive catalog is broken up into accepted works; controversial attributions; copies after Giorgione; and rejected attributions. All are discussed in varying degrees.
Concerning the Tempest Anderson strongly rejected the Adam and Eve interpretation of Salvatore Settis, as well as all other previous explanations that might be connected with a “story or text.”
For her the “most convincing interpretation” of the Tempest can be found in Colonna’s “Hypnerotomachia Poliphilo.” The painting depicts the encounter of the “young hero Poliphilo” with a deity. Although Anderson does not follow Marcantonio Michiel’s identification of the “soldier and the gypsy,” she does accept his description of the Teniers copy of the so-called “Discovery of Paris.”
A very valuable feature of Anderson’s catalog is the collection of documents relating to Giorgione in the original Italian at the back of the book.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh9l1fWTEs5_xVNb2clorQiDQnIaqvhVbqJJ6bvQRdDuuoIvuZIKBuiruXQAnP0rV_yNtvD_6tRGgi1XQlj6qSGQiDPutGOzHmx-kLvKQhT7t7ZPde4hHGYtWxFFZFT8mEi9Np5qperbA/s400/Giorgione%252C+Moses+Undergoing+Trial+by+Fire+1502-5.jpg)
This catalog came two years after Jaynie Anderson’s but it obviously represented a lifetime of work on the part of the two Italian authors. A little less than half the catalog is an essay on “The Life and Work of Giorgione,” by Terisio Pignatti. The author discusses the life and background of Giorgione but then devotes about 40 pages to a discussion of the attributed works.
In the second half of the book Filippo Pedrocco provides an invaluable summary of the attribution, provenance, and interpretive history of each attributed work. Especially valuable is their attempt to date the various works from early, through middle, to late career.
Although Pedrocco lists all the different interpretations of the Tempest, Pignatti concludes that there is an “undoubted presence of an underlying theme” but that the painting still “remains difficult to interpret.” Like Anderson the authors do not contest Michiel’s identification of the Teniers copy of the so-called “Discovery of Paris.”
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhs_lIRx5Iltc2eu-bILCagLmqpoo6PE32hqrg2WwQRn2Su3hRsvZXle4oafASynsTt3g43_jYSsQ4UWStpCfiannyHGy4jPQ_GihmwGtINEvSMjys5hVp_DPRck0ZGU1aFIzEKmTuypg/s400/gio+tempesta.jpg)
If I could only have one catalog in my library, my choice would be “Giorgione, Myth and Enigma,” the exhibition catalog for the groundbreaking 2004 Giorgione exhibition jointly sponsored by the Accademia in Venice and the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna. Both institutions contributed their Giorgione works to the exhibition, and for the first time the Tempest traveled outside of Italy for the Vienna show.
The catalog featured a number of essays by leading scholars highlighted by a brilliant essay on the Castelfranco altarpiece by Salvatore Settis. There were also four essays offering differing interpretations of the Tempest.
The 25 catalog entries were written by a group of world-class scholars including Giovanna Nepi-Scire and Sylvia Ferino-Pagden, the respective curators from the two Museums sponsoring the exhibition. In her essay on the Tempest, Nepi-Scire declined to take sides in the interpretation controversy.
This catalog is especially noteworthy for the appendix that includes three essays on the extensive scientific studies conducted in preparation for the exhibition.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiyLMTOis4N-a6Yb4HZ_ZQpP40kx934qe7j8xm6JzzTMgHaKDoLUDe6CEljeBrTIGLD4K_Xk4odxiZTXuoDUfdks7hJAr1m5tNr9W7Y5sei1UPOHdbsF97Kk_ROHRDnvsLAtTjOelu5Bg/s400/Giorgio+Philoi.jpg)
Brown, David Alan, and Ferino-Pagden, Sylvia, "Bellini, Giorgione, Titian, and the Renaissance of Venetian Painting," Washington, 2006.
Two years after the 2004 Giorgione exhibition an equally ambitious venture was jointly launched by the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna, and the National Gallery in Washington. The resulting catalog reflected the attempt of the exhibition to cover the broad range of the Venetian Renaissance.
The catalog featured works of Giorgione along with those of Giovanni Bellini, Titian, and lesser artists like Paris Bordone and Lorenzo Lotto. In the catalog these works were arranged according to themes just as in the actual exhibition.
After four introductory essays different scholars each took a theme: Peter Humfrey “Sacred Images;” Mario Lucco “Sacred Stories;” Jaynie Anderson “Allegories and Mythologies;” Sylvia Ferino-Pagden “Pictures of Women—Pictures of Love;” and David Alan Brown, the curator of the National Gallery, “Portraits of Women.”
Of all the catalogs this one is the broadest in scope but since the Tempest was not included in the exhibition, there is no separate catalog item on Giorgione’s most famous painting.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhX0bg3_6TlVQHCU9a1_mivvAA37i_Lo3yFMAsltMkyEs6QUHHOO0QQeN6zHBwF3GkrtopDJJGe_BDzmdsxpXF2jb_h6oDD9DRpx_5ShWK8oKM-3yMvy0skVdFi-qMiPLv7YuIANW04Cw/s400/giorgione-portrait.jpg)
Wolfgang Eller’s “Giorgione, Catalogue Raisonne,” was not associated with any exhibition. Subtitled, “Mystery Unveiled,” this solo effort obviously represents a lifetime of work on the part of this scholar.
Twelve introductory essays take up a little less than a quarter of this 200 page volume, but they are packed with information and learning. Especially valuable is his essay, “The most Significant Stylistic and Painterly Criteria for an Attribution to Giorgione.” No one looks at a painting or describes it more closely than Eller.
It appears to me that his strong point is attribution and he makes some radical departures from the usual. He gives the Pastoral concert to Giorgione, and also believes that he participated in Titian’s, “Noli Me Tangere.”
If Eller is strong on attribution and painterly criteria, I believe that his interpretations are often overly complicated. His interpretation of the Tempest is so involved that it is difficult to follow. He accepts with some puzzlement the identification of the Teniers copy of the lost Giorgione as the “Discovery of Paris.”
Finally, his catalog is extremely valuable since, like Anderson, he provides a discussion of every painting that was ever associated with Giorgione—even the false attributions. This feature alone makes this relatively inexpensive, and easily usable catalog a must for any student.
Thank you for the great summary Frank - very handy!
ReplyDeleteI find Eller's dedication to giving Pastoral Concert to Giorgione fascinating. Having read the snippets from this volume about this it is of course far from conclusive!
I like the sound of the listed catalogues that have accompanying scientific summaries. I think I'd veer to them first.
I'm curious why the dal Pozzolo volume monograph is not included in your summary. Is it not as comprehensive as these others in your estimation?
I'm still amazed to think that among all these world class scholars, that not one of them has seen fit to include 'The Rest'. I can understand if they dont agree, but they need to demonstrate why it is not an apporpriate reading - which I think would be hard to do.
When you first presented it at 3PP, I had no qualms shifting my stance to include it because it is so logically and historically sound. The far fetched readings of many of these scholars are nowhere near as well grounded.
I'm also fascinated to know what resources in other languages exist. That elusive German reading of Tempest as 'The Rest' is a tantalising but elusive prospect I don't think we'll be able to peruse in English any time soon.
H
H:
ReplyDeleteI did not include dal Pozzolo's "Giorgione" because it is more of study of Giorgione than a catalog. I plan to review it separately soon.
With the exception of Anderson's all the catalogs were written originally in either Italian or German. Actually, the Bellini, Giorgione, Titian articles were originally in English, German, and Italian. In each case the difficult job of translation was handled beautifully.
As far as I can tell the scientific studies are interesting but never definitive.
Thanks for the comment.
Frank