tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7054785923214156833.post3924548484424668137..comments2024-02-03T17:02:45.046-08:00Comments on Giorgione et al...: Giorgione and LeonardoDr. Fhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08469403843869655063noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7054785923214156833.post-72979299145715684812012-06-17T13:03:55.191-07:002012-06-17T13:03:55.191-07:00Atana:
I did not include a discussion of the pent...Atana:<br /><br />I did not include a discussion of the pentimenti in my paper but did discuss them on a blogpost dated 10/24/10. Typing 'pentimento' on the search bar will get you there. I also discussed it on the blog portion of my website. At the time I did not think the pentimenti belonged in the paper even though the "man on the bridge" supported my argument.<br /><br />I do not believe that Giorgione originally intended to have two women in the painting. He might have originally placed the woman on the left but then changed his mind. He might have just done an initial practice sketch on the canvas. He might have reused an old canvas. Who can say?<br /><br />FrankDr. Fhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08469403843869655063noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7054785923214156833.post-73221689147067639072012-06-17T10:07:25.712-07:002012-06-17T10:07:25.712-07:00Thank you for another great post! I'm beginnin...Thank you for another great post! I'm beginning to look more and more into your interpretation of "The Tempest" being a depiction of the "Flight into Egypt" scene. I wonder if you have already addressed the subject of it's pentimenti, the x-ray image that reveals the absence of the Soldier (or in your interpretation Joseph) figure in the first layers, and the presence of another bathing female figure in the same spot? Do you think that Giorgione, perhaps, started that painting as something else and the final idea was developed later (which was definitely not uncommon), or do you have another explanation?Atana L.https://www.blogger.com/profile/00981128873021046455noreply@blogger.com