A “lost”
Giorgione painting which has been misidentified for almost 500 years can shed
new light on the work and career of the most mysterious and perhaps the
greatest of all Venetian Renaissance painters.
In 1525, fifteen
years after the death of Giorgione, Marcantonio Michiel noticed a painting in
the home of Venetian patrician, Taddeo Contarini, and described it as a
“picture on canvas, representing the birth of Paris, in a landscape, with two
shepherds standing.…” Michiel noted that it was one of Giorgione’s “early
works.”[i]
This
painting has been lost, but copies exist from the seventeenth century. The
editor of the 1903 translation of Michiel’s notes cited a description in an
“old manuscript catalog of the time.”
A landscape on canvas, in oil, where there are on one side, a half nude woman and an old man, seated, with a flute.[ii]
One of the copies, made by David
Teniers around 1655, is currently in a private collection but was discussed in
two recent catalogues. The authors of both catalogues agree that it is a copy
of an early Giorgione and also accept, although with some puzzlement, Michiel’s
identification of the painting as “the birth of Paris.”[iii]
However, details in this early Giorgione indicate that it has quite a different
subject than the one imagined by Michiel.
The subject
of this “lost” Giorgione comes from a legendary episode on the flight of the
Holy Family into Egypt. Here is the version from the apocryphal “Arabic Gospel
of the Infancy.”
Joseph and the lady Mary departed and came to a desert place, and when they heard that it was infested with raids by robbers, they decided to pass through this region by night. But behold, on the way they saw two robbers lying on the road, and with them a crowd of robbers who belonged to them, likewise sleeping. Now these two robbers, into whose hands they had fallen, were Titus and Dumachus. And Titus said to Dumachus: ‘I ask you to let these (people) go free, and in such a way that our companions do not observe them.’ But Dumachus refused and Titus said again:
‘Take from me forty drachmae and have them as a pledge.’ At the same time he reached him the girdle which he wore round him, that he might hold his tongue and not speak.[iv]
In
Legends of the Madonna Anna Jameson called the encounter with the
robbers an “ancient tradition,” and added another detail. After the acceptance
of his offer, “the merciful robber led the Holy Travellers to his stronghold on
the rock, and gave them lodging for the night.”[v]
The
landscape in the background of the painting is commonplace in depictions of the
Flight into Egypt. The stream is often seen in versions of the “Rest.” It was
used by the Madonna to either bathe, or to wash the swaddling clothes of her
Son.
Bathing
might explain Mary’s exposed leg and arms but the disarray of her clothing
could also be Giorgione’s way of representing her obvious danger from the
robbers. In a painting now in the Hermitage Giorgione exposed the thigh of
Judith, the famous Jewish heroine whose virtue was also threatened.[vi]
In any case Mary sits with her back to Joseph with her eyes intent on her Son,
her real protector. Joseph is portrayed as an elderly graybeard as in
Giorgione’s well-known Nativities. The infant Christ lies on a white cloth and
returns his mother’s imploring look. The white cloth recalls the corporale, the cloth used to cover the
altar on which the Eucharist is placed.[vii]
The two men on the right side are
not shepherds but robbers. A Giorgione shepherd would be kneeling or bending
over the Child in adoration. The one with the red jacket has just convinced the
other to leave the Holy Family in peace. He has taken off his “girdle” leaving
himself somewhat exposed and given it to the other who is in the process of
fixing it around his waist. The band of robbers can be seen lounging in the
middle ground. Joseph’s flute recalls the well-known verse from Juvenal: “A
wanderer who has nothing can sing in a robber’s face.”[viii]
In “The
Encounter with the Robbers in the Desert” Giorgione did not attempt to hide the
subject of that early work. If no one has recognized its subject from Michiel’s
time to ours, it is because the very popular apocryphal legends have largely
been forgotten. Early in his career Giorgione was working not on a pagan
subject derived from the legend of Paris but on a depiction of an apocryphal
legend based on the Flight into Egypt. Moreover, he showed an inclination, even
at this early stage in his brief career, to depict the Madonna in a very
unusual way.
###
*** The above is part of a post that was one of the first to appear at Giorgione et al... back in 2010. I reproduce it here for new readers. It can also be found at MyGiorgione with my other major papers on Giorgione, Titian and the Venetian Renaissance. In the past seven years I have seen or read nothing that would make me want to change my interpretation of this lost Giorgione.
###
*** The above is part of a post that was one of the first to appear at Giorgione et al... back in 2010. I reproduce it here for new readers. It can also be found at MyGiorgione with my other major papers on Giorgione, Titian and the Venetian Renaissance. In the past seven years I have seen or read nothing that would make me want to change my interpretation of this lost Giorgione.
[i] The
Anonimo, Notes on Pictures and Works of Art in Italy made by an Anonymous
Writer in the Sixteenth Century, ed. George C. Williamson, London, 1903. p.
104.
[ii] ibid.
note 1.
[iii] Jaynie
Anderson, Giorgione, 1997, p. 317; and Wolfgang Eller, Giorgione
Catalog Raisonne, Petersburg, 2007, pp. 171-173.
[iv] Extract
from the Arabic Infancy Gospel in Edgar Hennecke, New Testament Apocrypha,
edited by Wilhelm Schneemelcher, English translation edited by R. McL. Wilson,
Volume One, Philadelphia 1963. p. 408. On the web a search for the First
Gospel of the Infancy of Jesus, Chapter. VIII, will give the story with
slightly different wording.
[v] Jameson, Legends of the Madonna,
Boston, 1885. pp. 361-362. Mrs. Jameson noted that the encounter with the
robbers has been “seldom treated” as an artistic subject but did indicate that
she had seen two representations. “One is a fresco by Giovanni di San Giovanni,
which, having been cut from the wall of some suppressed convent, is now in the
academy at Florence. The other is a composition by Zuccaro.” In a later edition
she provided a sketch of the Zuccaro “Encounter,” which shows Joseph assisting
the Madonna down from the Ass at the behest of the armed robber.
[vi] In
Judith’s famous prayer she recalled her ancestor Simeon who took vengeance on
the foreigners “who had undone a virgin’s girdle to her shame, laid bare her
thigh to her confusion…” Judith 9:2, Jerusalem Bible.
[vii] For
the corporale see the discussion of
Titian’s Pesaro Altarpiece in Rona
Goffen, Piety and Patronage in Renaissance
Venice, Yale, 1986, p. 114.
[viii]
Juvenal, Satires, X, 22. I thank Dr. Karin Zeleny of the Kunsthistorisches
Museum in Vienna for the Juvenal reference.
David comments from England:
ReplyDeleteThanks for the link to your Giorgione page. What gives extra credence to your suggestion is that Dumachus the thief was, according to legend, the 'bad thief' of the crucifixion, giving an extra resonance to the painting. As in crucifixion scenes, he is shown on Christ's left.