This year I am reprising the most viewed posts on Giorgione et al... Since its inception in 2010, the site has garnered almost 540,000 page views. An introductory essay on the Pastoral Concert ranks number 3 on the list of views. I have added some notes on my findings since then.
*******
The “Pastoral Concert” or “Concert Champetre” that now hangs in the Louvre is universally recognized as one of the world’s great masterpieces. Usually dated around 1510-1511 it is surrounded, like other famous products of the Venetian Renaissance, by an aura of mystery and enigma. Not only has scholarly opinion been divided about whether to attribute the painting to Giorgione or Titian, but also no one has been able to come up with a plausible explanation of the subject or meaning of the painting.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgPLi7rOhAI2imkyJ1Bq0LR1GvfXBmncQ0lVtf0366hStxEuwwBiNsxgwTlwZ9tXQ4C7lTYj1h9GXBIC4fBmw1GDrq4ukzxritViTWcWTzOJCBa0YJyUsTEdemqHlAeCnh0aDYCoS4zMA/s400/Concert_.jpg) |
Titian: Pastoral Concert (Louvre) |
In this post I present a synopsis of a “working hypothesis” that provides a new interpretation of the subject of the "Pastoral Concert" and also resolves the question of attribution. I argue that Titian used the famous Biblical story of Jonathan and David to provide a framework for a personal homage to Giorgione, his recently deceased mentor and friend. The full 3500 word interpretation can be found at
MyGiorgione, a site devoted to my work on Giorgione, Titian, and the art of the Venetian Renaissance.
Before going any further it should be noted that my reading is speculative and unorthodox. As far as I know a painterly homage would be unique and unprecedented in the art of the Venetian Renaissance.* Nevertheless, there is no settled opinion on the subject of the “Pastoral Concert”, and a Titian homage to Giorgione answers most of the questions that have surrounded the painting. **
This interpretation explains why Titian put so many Giorgionesque elements in the painting, but also identifies the four main figures in the painting as well as their relationship with one another. The man on the left wearing finery and holding the lute is Giorgione. Many of the features of Giorgione that Vasari mentions in his short biography can be seen in this young man. Moreover, three here-to-fore inexplicable details in the painting indicate that Giorgione is dead: his face is in shadow; the lute has no strings; and the nude on the left is pouring into a well. **
This interpretation then identifies the young rustic on the right as Titian. He depicts himself as Giorgione’s social inferior but also as his successor. His closeness to the other man as well as his connection with the flock in the mid ground brings to mind the biblical story of David and Jonathan. Titian identifies himself with David, the soul-mate and successor of Jonathan.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjt2BAYf9_9B0gJhaDXRZ-VdAKWUpIbv3qkUbeCa_t_Xcq3UQcm-9BrhYErRau39D3pojlfzs9BozlejII-HG_gMSN3t7CSiXJz5Q9wpNM4PqrvtybFNUeAJpVhOREFXh-qvfcW6Bz-3Q/s320/Cima_David_Jonathan.jpg) |
Cima da Conegliano: David and Jonathan National Gallery, London, c. 1506-10. |
My interpretation agrees with those scholars who have observed that the two female nudes in the painting are muses who are invisible to the two men. Although muses are the source of inspiration, the men are oblivious of their presence. Indeed, I argue that the two nudes are the same muse. She is Euterpe, the muse of lyric poetry and music. The standing nude is pouring Giorgione’s spirit out, but on the right she is looking directly at Titian.
To express his homage to the deceased Giorgione, Titian incorporated many Giorgionesque elements into the painting. Practically everything that Vasari said about Giorgione can be found in this painting. The most telling evidence is the reference to the story of the paragone where Giorgione claimed supremacy for painting over sculpture since he could portray every aspect of a figure on a flat surface. In one glance the viewer sees the front, the back and the profile of the nude Euterpe.
Many have seen that the relationship between the two young men in the “Pastoral Concert” is the key to the painting. Some have even seen a strong trace of “homo-eroticism.” In my opinion the bond between two young warriors, or two young artists is sufficient to explain the painting. Look at the painting and consider David’s lament on hearing the news of the death of Jonathan.
O Jonathan, in your death I am stricken
I am desolate for you, Jonathan my brother.
Very dear to me you were,
Your love to me more wonderful
than the love of a woman.
2 Samuel 1:19-26
###
* I originally wrote these words in May, 2013. Only in 2020 did I discover that art historian Christiane Joost-Gaugier had seen the painting as Titian's homage to the deceased Giorgione back in 1999. (Joost-Gaugier, Christiane L. "The mute poetry of the Fete Champetre: Titian’s memorial to Giorgione." Gazette des Beaux Arts, January 1999, Issue 1560, pp. 1-14.)
Initially, this discovery was somewhat embarrassing since I should have found Dr. Gaugier's interpretation earlier. However, it became somewhat comforting to find that I had come independently to a similar conclusion with someone of her stature, knowledge, and experience. Nevertheless, while I agree with much of Dr. Gaugier's analysis, I do have disagreements with some of the conclusions she drew from her insights. I discussed the areas of agreement and disagreement in a subsequent post.
** For a bibliographical essay on the painting see the post on Giorgione et al... dated 6/17/2013.
*** Since 2013, I have come to recognize that the dark clouds in the background are also a sign of the death of Giorgione.
Awesome Frank. At the Barnum museum in Florida some yrs back I was amazed at his collection of Titian’s paintings. To see the originals was an esthetic experience
ReplyDeleteToday I read of how ill prepared curators of museums have been to rote their treasures.